Showing posts with label anna bligh; wivenhoe dam; nh lymphoma;. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anna bligh; wivenhoe dam; nh lymphoma;. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

floods of concern



Now that Anna Bligh has bared her soul [and pate] about her battle with Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma, some interesting comments and attitudes are emerging.

The ABC news website linked to a preview shot of the newly bald Bligh in the next Women's Monthly Weekly mag.

For all that my live-in medical expert tells me about this disease or that, I was surprised to learn a small lump the size of a pea on Bligh's face was a symptom of something so nasty.

But on now to the issue of bravery … sure there are plenty of anonymous people "out there" who face similar or worse battles all the time, but it's nice to see someone use their high profile in a positive way.

As the comments under the WW article trickle in, some person [I'm here now spelt backwards] says:

I have absolutely no respect for this person she and her treasurer caused directly the deaths of many by over filling the Wivenhoe dam if she was in control of a privately run organisation she may well be in Jail right now, yes she was concerned during the floods she was concerned people would find out it was her who was to blame and there might well be a public stoning.

To be honest, I am not particularly enamoured of many politicians, but I can't imagine wishing them harm or illness, nor being delighted to hear about it. FFS.

Despite the appalling consequences of the Wivenhoe dam disaster, I find it hard to believe Bligh was directly responsible for the dam being overfilled in the first place. I've not read the results of any enquiries, but who goes into parliament with a complete check list of things they ought to investigate?

"Item 4, 962,182 -Are any dams overfilled?".
Without personally flying over them and cross-examining engineers, boards, or whoever the heck was in charge of them, how would she know, and how would she know she ought to know?
Can one really go through life having no faith in any experts at all? Leaders are supposed to delegate.

She might have had to make a judgment call about whether to evacuate towns downstream – perhaps she had to choose between two evils and opted for the one which would be the least disastrous – but again, at least she wasn't off chatting with her biographer and having her hair cut once the shit hit the fan.


I'm sure I've seen a box at the intersection of Melbourne's Bolte and Westgate Bridges marked DISPLAN. If it's still there, I bet it's padlocked.
If a disaster does occur there, who the heck is supposed to read it for instructions? Does one simply park their car to one side and wait, trusting that whoever has the key/ knows the plan will be instantly aware of what's happening and turn up in the blink of an eye to put the plan into action?

Has Premier Naptime read every DISPLAN in the state?

I've just finished reading An Awkward Truth, which goes into some detail about what happened the first day the Japanese bombed Darwin in 1942. What a bloody shemozzle. The army ignored a warning from Bathurst Island and then, following the bombing, the most astonishing chain of stupid decisions ensued.
Amongst them, the Territory administrator [Abbott] commandeered some policemen and a vehicle so he could save the crockery and wine collection from his government residence. He thought it would be best if he removed himself to Alice Springs and oversee the situation from there.
Yep, way to go. 
If only they'd had a DISPLAN. Or a job description with "able to set priorities" as one of the criteria.

 ------------------

The department of health payroll shemozzle over which Bligh presided was patently ludicrous. It sounds a bit like the Myki nonsense, except it directly affected and had far reaching financial consequences for lots of people.

The trouble is, the "experts" of this world grew up with technology, and I find it astonishing how many organisations have no manual back-up plan at all in case their computer system crashes.



Did she ask her trusted advisers why they had no manual system, or couldn't quickly knock one up? The problem continued month after month after month.


Okay, I'll give her a fail for that one. She should have thrown a KRudd level tantie and scared someone into action. But I think it's enough she lost the election – she certainly doesn't deserve cancer as punishment.


As for Anna's bald head - not the right shape like Sinead's, but she still looks cute.