Friday, November 30, 2012
Friday, November 23, 2012
look no further
That's
right readers, it's that time of the year again.
Once again, FruitCake is bringing you the best guide
to the best presents to give or receive this Christmas.
The first
thing everyone needs at Christmas is protection from all those inane songs
about sleighbells and snow. Do your weekly shop in comfort with these specially
designed ear plugs. When Christmas is over, simply turn them upside down and
use them as white pawns. A gift that keeps on giving all year round!
Are you
one of those people who simply can't tell a joke without spoiling the
punchline? Never mind, there will be gags aplenty at your Christmas do this
year!! Simply make yourself some of these special denture ice cubes, and slip
them into any guest's drink when they are not looking!!!
Why is
this cute little fella called I RUB MY DUCKIE? If you know, don't make the mistake of sharing!!!
The
perfect gift for the family's favourite fantasy freak: Canned Unicorn Meat!!!!
[Parsley
not included].
Forget
Disney-themed Bandaids... these special bandaids are perfect for spots, cuts and rashers!!!!!
At least
one gift every year has to be some boring, practical article of clothing,
right? Well, you can give two gifts for the price of one with this Jedi Dressing Gown!!!!!!
For the
man who is constantly fishing in his pocket... his very own, special rod!!!!!!!
You won't
know who's the turkey this Christmas until people start swapping their
Kringles. Yep, it's a special beer can chook cooker. How environmentally
friendly is that?!!!!!!!!!!
Remember that resolution you made back in January? Now's your big chance to give those annoying oldies the
flick!!!!!!!!!!!
We've
never met a woman yet that wouldn't prefer a handy housework tool to any other
gift. These special dry mop as you slop slippers come in the only colour
combination any Aussie needs - Green and Gold. Bound to be a winner!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The
perfect team-building idea for the work place. Let your work mates know you know them well, and appreciate them for who they really are!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Of
course, if you have a work mate who is not a twat but still something else, why
not personalise your message with this special mug and letter set? Comes with
150 plastic letters that will stay where you put them until they are
moved.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Not
dishwasher friendly. Recommended for use by persons over 50 only, who know how
to wash up by hand.]
There's
not an opposition whip in the country who wouldn't love one of
these beauties. Forget ringing the bells to announce an important vote, this
bullshit button will make it more than clear party members had better get their
skates on in time to vote veto!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Last but
by no means least, here's a gift you'll need to order wholesale cos everyone
who sees one will want one. Just touch the guitar T shirt and you'll strike a
chord.
Doesn't matter how shy you are, just wear one of these and everyone at
the party will want to pluck you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ho Ho Ho... Condiments of the Seasoning!
STOP PRESS
How did I forget? If you've checked out my favourite blogs on the sidebar, you already know that Red Nomad Oz of Amazing Australian Adventures is famous for her quirky and colourful views of Australia.
Due to popular demand, she has made a calendar from her highly acclaimed Classic Aussie Loos series. You, the customer, can even choose which month of the year the calendar will start - an iconoclastic approach to presenting pictures of Aussie Icons!
STOP PRESS
How did I forget? If you've checked out my favourite blogs on the sidebar, you already know that Red Nomad Oz of Amazing Australian Adventures is famous for her quirky and colourful views of Australia.
Due to popular demand, she has made a calendar from her highly acclaimed Classic Aussie Loos series. You, the customer, can even choose which month of the year the calendar will start - an iconoclastic approach to presenting pictures of Aussie Icons!
Thursday, November 22, 2012
sinking feelings, all round
Don
watched as the airline steward carefully rocked and rolled with the plane,
trying not to let the turbulence disturb her balance.
A cost
accountant, Don guesstimated how much the airline saved dishing out coffee
during a bumpy ride. His cup was about 80% full. Multiply that by 300
passengers at say, 20 cents a cup that’s a saving of 60 dollars. Not bad.
“And the
catering carts are sensible,” he thought. “Just wide enough for the aisles so
that if there is turbulence it can’t move around too much and do a lot of
damage. That would lower their insurance costs. Not to mention when the carts
are out it’s harder for people to get to the loos, which would save a lot on
toilet paper and hand towels.”
On the
other side of the aisle Don’s mate Fred was thinking about what he had learnt
at the convention. His mind was a blank.
Charlie,
the third member of their accounting firm, was seated behind Fred. Charlie was
not a good flyer. In his mind’s eye a graph appeared; the solid line mapped the
up and down movements of the plane due to turbulence, and the dotted line mapped
the up and down movements of the lunch he had finished half an hour before. As
the plane lurched up his lunch lurched down, and vice versa. He was wondering
what units he would use to label the y axis when a bolt of lightning hit the
right wing.
The
lights inside the plane flickered on and off for a minute, then everything went
black completely. In the dark, no one could see Charlie’s knuckles go white as
he gripped the armrest of his seat.
There was
a small scream from a seat further up as the steward poured scalding hot coffee
onto the lap of a passenger. Don made a mental note to write to the airline
suggesting they revise their quality assurance safety procedure for making sure
the coffee was not too hot. People were too quick to sue these days. It’s a
wonder anyone went into business at all, return for risk being so hard to
control.
Charlie’s
graph disappeared and was suddenly replaced by a mental picture of the plane
bursting into flame, exploding and breaking apart. Passengers and bits of metal
flew out in all directions. For a brief moment, Charlie wished he was an
economist – someone who, it was widely agreed, lacked the imagination to be an
accountant. Surely his imagination was disturbing him unnecessarily.
His lunch
suddenly came all the way up as there was a huge BANG.
The plane
tilted forward and began nosing its way down toward the ocean below. At an
exponential rate.
Don noted
the oxygen masks hadn’t dropped from the ceiling. Definitely a breach of
contract. When he leant forward to pull his life jacket out from under the seat
his head hit the tray, knocking him out. He slumped forward, unconscious, in
his seat.
The
wheel-lock on the catering cart gave way, the cart pushing over the steward,
tipping, and breaking the steward’s nose as it fell.
A greenie
in the back row of the plane became anxious. He had thought long and hard
before even getting on the plane, worrying if he could justify leaving such a
huge carbon footprint in its wake. “Shit”, he berated himself, “now we’ll
probably kill a dolphin when we hit the water as well.”
It seemed
like an eternity before the plane hit the water. Four passengers, including Don’s
wife, had died of heart attacks on the way down.
Into the
ocean plunged the plane, down and down into the murky depths until the little air
inside the cabin finally caused it to slow. Charlie’s arms dog paddled
instinctively, trying to right himself and head back up to the surface. The
last thing he heard before he passed out himself was Fred telling his wife he
wanted a divorce…
------------------
Fred was
surprised to discover, when he reached the Pearly Gates, that his clothes were
dry. He felt calm. He pushed the buzzer on the main gate, not having to wait
too long before a shaft of bright, white light moved closer.
An old man
wearing nothing but a nightie, sandals and a long white beared appeared out of
the light.
“Next”,
the old man intoned in a bored voice.
“Fred,”
said Fred. “Fred Smith.”
The old
man checked a giant ledger sitting on a disk near the gate. Fred watched,
surprised to note he could read the old guy’s mind. The old guy was peeved.
“Why,”
the old man wondered, “did everyone assume his name was Peter?”
He
wondered on. Why did Peter always get the credit for manning the gate? Hadn’t
anybody heard of a Roster? He wondered why the on-call for night duty part of
the roster always had his name – Rocky – on it. He wondered what grave sin he
had committed a few thousand years ago that saw him stuck for eternity on night
shift. It was a long time since he’d had a decent sleep, that was for sure.
“Smith!”
the old man continued mumbling to himself. “Everyone who arrives at night is a
bloody Smith.” He wondered, too, why an omnipotent God still insisted he use a
ledger. A computer would surely be easier. And if they must use a ledger, why
weren’t the pages made of paper, instead of great bloody slabs of rock?
He
checked Smith’s name and address from the ID offered, then looked up at Fred
and the woman standing next to him. “Is this your wife?”
“Yes,”
said Fred.
“You were
an accountant? On your way home from a convention?”
“Yep”,
said Fred.
“Nope,”
said the old guy. “You’re for the other place. Says here you were an accountant
who used some very creative accounting methods to rip off your clients. You
falsified details on your own tax returns. In fact, you loved money so much you
married a woman named Penny.
Follow
that sign to the holding pen, and someone will be along to get you shortly.”
The next
to step forward was Don. Don Jones.
Accountant
on his way home from a convention. Liked a drinkie or too. Beer, wine, spirits –
anything alcoholic. Did a sloppy job for your clients cos you were constantly
pissed.
“In fact,
you were such a drunk you married a woman named Sherry.”
The Old
guy pointed to the holding area, and said “Wait over there.”
“Name?”
the old guy asked, not even bothering to look up.
“No need
to look,” Charlie said to Rocky before turning to his wife. “Let’s go, Fannie.”
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
crimes against property
Some
decades ago some developer bought up a passel of single fronted cottages in
Camberwell. The plan was to tear them down and provide a carpark for a new
supermarket or retail complex or some such.
There was
one little old lady who said “hell no, I won’t go”. No amount of money was
enough, because she was not interested in money. She had lived in the house all
of her life and, although many of her friends had passed on and she had lost
her “community” she insisted she was too old to move and restart her life
somewhere else.
For years
there it stood, her tiny little weatherboard house smack bang in the middle of
a huge carpark, defiantly “giving the finger” to developers. I wish I knew her
name, or could find a photo.
This
carpark is the home of Rotary’s famous Camberwell Sunday market. Camberwell is
a nice suburb, and the market attracts a huge number of potential buyers who
are actually prepared to buy something if they like it.
Setting
up a stall at a good market is a great way to promote a new product, like a
gourmet chutney, or artworks, or photographic services. It’s a chance to market
stuff to a very specific demographic.
I haven’t
been to that market for a very long time, but back in the day there were some
stall holders who had piles of what looked like crap but which appealed to
people for various reasons. In a long established suburb like Camberwell, some
of the crap had nostalgia value - set designers would come looking for anything
from kitchen appliances that no longer worked, to old tools from a particular
era.
It was
also a market which helped me survive for months, one year, when I was
struggling to find a decent job. Living only a few minutes’ walk away, it was
easy for me to queue up before cock-crow and grab an “unbooked” stall.
For
months, my flat was knee deep in crap. It would have made a great setting for a
doco about hoarders only the crap I had was not crap; it was my stock in trade.
Acquiring stock was easy: there were always stall holders having a once only
clean up around the home. They carted their stuff to the market and there was
no way they were going to take home anything that hadn’t sold. They never
offered me money to help them dispose of the rubbish, but they were usually
happy to give me their left-overs for nothing.
Jim
Cairns was there every Sunday, trying to flog his books. I suspect he was quite
lonely, and really looking for someone to talk to about any of the burning
issues addressed in his books.
-----------
One day I
made the fatal mistake of setting up a stall at a northern suburbs market, held
on the grounds of an old drive-in picture theatre.
A man who
had booked three stall spaces opposite me pulled up at about 7.30 am driving a
large station wagon, and towing a trailer big enough to carry a car.
I had not
seen such a huge pile of non-biodegradable rubbish in my life, nor have I seen
one since.
He
removed the tarps holding his ‘stock’ down in the trailer, put the tarps on the
ground, and proceeded to unload the ‘stock’ and spread it out on the tarps. By
about 10 he had unloaded the trailer and the station wagon, then sat down on a
folding beach chair, and poured himself a cup of coffee from a huge thermos. He
then opened his ‘lunch box’ and pulled out some sandwiches. At about 11 am he
started loading all the crap back into the car and the trailer.
All of
that effort netted him about $40. I won’t say “only” $40 because his takings
were about 4 times the size of mine. There’s a different type of customer in
the northern suburbs.
He wasn’t
in it for the money, he explained. He collected the crap to annoy his wife. She
would shoo him out of the house on Sundays, telling him to get rid of it. This
was his way of getting permission to spend a day by himself.
He was a
born people watcher, and grinned from ear to ear from the time he arrived until
the time he left.
Amongst
the detritus spread out on the tarps, some woman had found a piece of brass
chain – the sort used to attach plugs to sinks in Victorian bathrooms.
She
picked up the chain, examined it, fondled it, held it for a while, then put it
back down. After three laps of the market, she seemed committed.
“How much?”
she asked.
“20 cents”
said the trailer man.
“I’ll
give you ten” she said, reaching into her purse for a coin.
“No, 20
cents,” he said.
“It’s
only worth ten cents” she countered.
“Oh no,”
he corrected her, “that is actually worth 40 cents. Even 20 cents is too cheap.”
She put
the chain back down, stared at it for a while, then tore herself away. Two more
laps of the drive-in market, and she picked it up again.
“10
cents.”
“30”,
trailer man said.
Her
eyebrows shot up. “You said 20 before!” She sounded aggrieved.
“It was
an investment. I held on to it for a while, and it is now worth more than it
was before.”
Trailer
man had a ball that day. Chain woman never did buy the piece of chain, but I
bet she was kicking herself later. She really was convinced she should be able
to put one over on him. No doubt her self-confidence was shattered, that day.
I discovered,
that day, that having a stall at that particular market was pointless. But I
really enjoyed myself, and the company of trailer man.
“No point
to bring anything good here,” he explained. “Here, they just want shit. And still
they won’t buy unless they think you are stupid”.
-------------------------
In the
Franger area and, in other less sophisticated suburbs than Camberwell, regular traders
do the rounds of garage sales on Saturday mornings, bitching and moaning and
haggling over ten cents for stuff they can sell at a profit at a Sunday market.
There are
some that move in packs – while there are only one or two householders setting
up or selling, a swarm of 5 or six will arrive an hour early, and lift as much
as they can for nothing.
I’m all
for people being careful with their money, but if there’s one thing I can’t
stand it’s a scab. Another one thing I can’t stand is a tea-leaf.
So we’ve
learned to just put crap out for the first hour or two of a garage sale. If
somebody knocks it off, good riddance. By about 9 am the people coming by are
having fun rummaging, and willing to pay a bargain price for something half way
decent if they want it. That’s when we bring out the better ‘stuff’.
if it doesn't move, tag it |
Another
way people acquire stock is to follow hard rubbish collections from one suburb
to another. Some people smash open old TVs or PCs because there are small parts
from which they can salvage bits of copper or who knows what. There is one
couple who come well equipped - while the chappy whips out his electric
screwdriver and dismantles appliances, his chappette loads their ute or van with
panels and parts, presumably for sale to scrap metal merchants.
These
teams tend to specialise – knick knacks, flower pots, retro clothing. I think
it’s good that this stuff can be recycled, and find it silly that it’s against
the law to remove stuff from a hard rubbish collection. It’s the careless way
some of them spread trash and rubbish all over the place that’s objectionable,
and it’s this trashing of a street that ought to be illegal, not the recycling end
of business.
All we
had to dispose of this year was a dead microwave, which disappeared after about
two hours.
What
astonishes me is the amount of furniture people dispose of. Patty O’Furniture,
for example, that’s no longer the latest fashion. Beds and dining suites.
Lounge suites bought at a good price not so long ago, upholstery still as new,
and with no wear or tear because it was once in the home of an older, possibly
lonely relative.
In
between collections, some people use “the corner”. A broken office chair, for
example, can be plonked at “the corner” and within two days someone will have
taken it. There is a rental property on “the corner” which is an eyesore, so
the abandoned rubbish doesn’t look out of place.
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
the soap with silk
jesu joy of man’s
desiring
-----------
What a
bunch of greedy gutses we are.
Series 3
of Downton Abbey arrived and it takes a lot of discipline to limit ourselves to
one episode per night.
Apart
from the piddly number of episodes per season produced in a British series, the
only other frustration is that no matter how well I know every note of a “tune”
in a soundtrack, I’m hopeless at remembering the names of them.
The one
above was a rare victory that only took an hour or so scouring YouTube.
----------------------------------------
The good
news is that each episode warrants a second viewing – to sort out the plot
points missed; to re-live the best lines from Maggie Smith.
Next
viewing is just for ogling the clothes.
Or the
models.
What a
lark it would be, being paid to act and
to dress up in absolutely fabulous clothes.
I’m not a
Dowager Countess I’m a Dowdy Countess, but if I lived in a world where this
sort of dress was expected I would be in heaven. I would lose weight, grow six
inches and dye my hair black just so they wouldn’t look stupid on me.
Unless
stuck downstairs with only one or two frumpy dresses to my name, of course.
Slaving my guts out while the male servants stand around and preen in their suits and gloves.
An old Marty Feldman sketch [which goes something like this] pretty well sums up the class distinctions:
Duchess: Please Robert, not before the servants!
Duke: [stops smooching up to his wife]
Sorry Carstairs... after you.
Upper class or lower class, the one chap we can count on to hold it all together is the butler:
Slaving my guts out while the male servants stand around and preen in their suits and gloves.
An old Marty Feldman sketch [which goes something like this] pretty well sums up the class distinctions:
Duchess: Please Robert, not before the servants!
Duke: [stops smooching up to his wife]
Sorry Carstairs... after you.
Upper class or lower class, the one chap we can count on to hold it all together is the butler:
Monday, November 19, 2012
with friends like this, who needs enemas?
even more potty mouthed sms conversations between a dog and his "master"
[dog text is grey, master text is green]
--------------
part 3 [more in previous two posts if you have missed them]
still man's best friend [just]
more potty mouthed sms conversations between a dog and his "master"
[dog text is grey, master text is green]
more of these in previous post and in next one
man's best friend
potty mouthed sms conversations between a dog and his "master"
[dog text is grey, master text is green]
[dog text is grey, master text is green]
more in next post
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
budgie jumping
English Man
French Audience
Australian Birds
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
interests include fighting homosexuality
what price freedom?
RubyeJack opened a can of worms when she wondered why USians voted the way they did
in the Presidential election.
In my
last post I made some sweeping generalisations about the motivations of more
extreme Republican voters.
It’s hard
not to dismiss some Republican voters as nutters because, let’s face it, some Republicans do seem more than a tad “out there”.
Although
the nutters might be Conspicuous, the bulk of the Republican party’s supporters
– a silent majority if you’ll pardon the expression– are good, intelligent and
sensible people.
As much
as Michelle Bachmann seems a bit – well, funny – she is no joke. Enough people
have voted for her to make a member of Congress.
As she
tells it, Michelle just struggles to get the words right when she opens her mouth.
To be fair, I can be incoherent and waffly enough while tapping away at a keyboard, so I can’t pick on her for failing to find the words she is looking for when she has to speak without having time to think.
To be fair, I can be incoherent and waffly enough while tapping away at a keyboard, so I can’t pick on her for failing to find the words she is looking for when she has to speak without having time to think.
It's what
Bachmann has to say when she finally gets her point across clearly is harder to
understand or excuse.
She has a
Palinesque grasp of history and economics, and has some unlikeable values.
Perhaps the words “pray the gay away” are all you need hear to get the general
idea.
Not all Republican types are educated, aspiring politicians.
-----------------------
Not all Republicans show a lack of compassion, or insight into other people’s day to day struggles.
In most democracies, most people want the same thing regardless of how they vote. They want to do well for themselves and their families and do good for others with whatever they have to spare.
Most of us want the world to be a nicer place. Even people like Michelle Bachmann don’t deliberately wish anyone harm, however harmful their policies might be.
Most of us want the world to be a nicer place. Even people like Michelle Bachmann don’t deliberately wish anyone harm, however harmful their policies might be.
In political terms, the only difference between people on the left or the right is what they believe is the best way to go about making the world a nicer place.
The most significant difference between left and right opinions about how to make the world a nicer place revolves around money.
Who should decide what pies are made, how they’ll be made, and how the pies should be shared around once they have been made – governments, or the people themselves?
private enterprise and a free
market economy
The US has a
culture that enthusiastically extols the virtues of private enterprise and a
free market economy. We could go so far as saying that for many USians a free
market economy and social or political freedom are two sides of the same coin –
you can’t have one without the other.
People on
the right tend to have a stronger preference for a free market economy than people
on the left.
Free
market theories assume that people are motivated by self-interest. Given the
choice between sitting on my backside and having everyone else pay my bills, or
standing at an assembly line 60 hours a week, self-interest suggests I’d be
stupid not to sit on my backside. On the other hand, given the choice between
sitting on my backside starving, or standing at an assembly line 60 hours a
week, self-interest suggests I’d be stupid not to get a job.
In the
long run, letting other people pay my bills would be unfair to everyone else.
Many of
the things we have today we only have because someone else acted in their own
self interest. If we live in a city we rely on a shopkeeper to bring food to
us, but the shopkeeper does not usually do this out of the goodness of his/her
heart.
As one of
Rubye’s Republican voters, missrobin, put it: “…if
there is a problem, someone will step up to fix it – if only so they can make
money…”
---------------------
the job of government
As a rule
the free market, private enterprise and capitalism often solve important
problems more efficiently than any government could. But we must remember: Like
democracy, a free market /private enterprise/ self-interest/ price system might
be the best system there is, but it is far from perfect.
One of
the biggest flaws of a free market system – and there are plenty of flaws – is that it works as efficiently when put to
an immoral use as it does when put to a good use.
Without a
free market /private enterprise/ self-interest/ price system the supply of
illegal drugs would be far less efficient.
Without a
free market /private enterprise/ self-interest/ price system the arms industry wouldn’t
facilitate mass murder half so effectively.
Not
everything we do is okay just because there is a buck in it.
Even in
the best democracies, some government intervention is required to
- limit the operation of a free
market when the outcome is harmful
- compensate for some of the
free market system’s inherent flaws
myth: free enterprise saves
taxpayers money
Governments
can be unbelievably inefficient, but private enterprise is not always more
efficient, simply because it is private.
Theoretically,
it’s better if private enterprise rather than government delivers essential goods
and services. It’s in their owners’ best interests to be more efficient and
cost effective. The added bonus is that, with profit as an incentive, private
enterprise absorbs all of the risks involved in getting those goods and
services moving.
The
Global Financial Crisis or GFC occurred because, in an unregulated free market, a heap of free enterprise banks made a
heap of questionable home loans. If I understand correctly, these questionable
home loans were made precisely because it was in the best interests of
individual lenders to make them.
Unfortunately,
what resulted from this individual self-interest was not in the country’s best
interests. Because the banking sector was on the brink of collapse, the whole US economy was
on the brink of collapse. If the government had not provided money to prop up
the banking sector, everyone would have suffered far more.
In a perfect free market, the opportunity to
make a profit provides an incentive to free enterprise to accept risks – but a
free market is rarely perfect without government interference.
The
bankers making all those bad loans were gambling and, when they lost, taxpayers
were left with their gambling debts.
There are
really only two certainties in life; debt and taxes.
The
right’s preferred system – an unfettered free market – can hurt taxpayers as
much as the left’s preferred system of taking directly from the rich to give to the poor.
For all
its flaws, the free market /private enterprise/ self-interest/ price system is
the best system, but people who expect it to always deliver the best result are
kidding themselves. There is always a need for at least some government intervention.
next: the sum of the parts
Monday, November 12, 2012
the right viewpoint
Following
the re-election of Barack Obama, Rubye Jack acknowledged that there are
intelligent and caring people who voted for Mitt Romney, but was struggling to
understand – amongst other things – why working or middle class people would
support him.
TMD [too
much detail] is my specialty, but it is not my mission in life to force it on
people. Rather than hog the comments space under her post, I thought I might
blurt on endlessly about the possibilities here.
The
following sweeping generalisations are not intended to denigrate any USian – as
my thousands of readers will know, I am more disgusted with Aussie Politics
than words can adequately express.
----------
Because
I’m talking about the US, in this post I use the word “liberal” to mean those
whose politics are left of centre, or are more inclined to vote Democrat than
Republican [the right of centre, conservative party].
One of
the first comments under Rubye’s post points out, quite rightly, that many
people simply vote as they have always done.
It’s only
the small portion who change their vote or level of participation from one
election to the next that ultimately decide the outcome of an election. [Don’t
know about the States, but here we call them ‘swinging’ voters.]
Let's start with the people less likely to swing:
In
previous posts I’ve blurted on about Joe Bageant’s explanation of why rednecks
think and vote the way they do.
To oversimplify;
in living memory a white class with small farms and Bibles but little education
were once reasonably self-sufficient and content. Now they are unemployable and
disenfranchised.
Farming
technologies and cheap overseas labour have compounded their problems, but when
looking for an explanation of what went wrong, the most conspicuous changes
they can see/ understand are personal, emotional and smaller – growth of govt,
less conservative lifestyles, and changes in the racial/ cultural composition of
their communities. This poor white class is still largely uneducated.
Their way
of life was destroyed by big [agri]business, and they were later exploited as
cheap labour by other big businesses. Now that they are an unemployed
underclass, they see this as a problem caused by governments that don’t want to
encourage big business thereby creating jobs.
As the
late and great Joan Robinson said
...the misery of being
exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being
exploited at all.
Of
course, following the GFC, so-called rednecks and other undereducated people
are not the only class who are unemployed. But if this predominantly
god-fearing underclass was educated, would their attitudes change? That would
depend on the type of education they had. In the US there are two diametrically
opposed approaches to education:
Liberals
believe education should be about exposure to new ideas and a willingness to
question the status quo. Conservative education focuses more on religious or
work oriented goals.
For the
left, the Bible – especially the New Testament – can be seen as an exhortation
to be kind or even altruistic. For those on the right the Bible – especially
the Old Testament – might sometimes be simply be a tool for confirming warped
views of the world.
---------------------------
Conservatism,
by definition, is anti-change. Conservatives like to think about the good old
days when divorce rates were low and life was a slice of apple pie.
People
need certainty and therefore hesitate to embrace change. The past is not a
foreign country, it is a place people understand and therefore a place that
offers certainty.
Poorer
people might seek a change in their personal circumstances but see the means of
achieving this as a universal return to old
values. They are more likely to do this if they believe their class has fallen
in status and opportunity over time – if the position of their class has
shifted from relative privilege to relative disadvantage. For them, the American Dream is being replaced by a nightmare.
Humans
might not miss what they have never had, but they sure as heck will miss
something if it is taken away.
Liberals,
by definition, seek change. Change can be scary – especially to those who have
only experienced negative consequences from change.
Some
poorer people might seek a change in their personal circumstances but see the
means of achieving this as a universal shift to new values. Unlike classes whose status has fallen over the years,
some of the never-have-hads cannot be threatened by change – the possibility of
change is the only thing that offers them hope.
Q. When
is a minority no longer a minority?
A. When
the buggers start breeding and multiplying faster than the once-hads.
John
Meynard Keynes observed that workers rarely gave a hoot about their absolute
worth, it was their relative worth that drove them. No one wants to see
themselves losing ground. We don’t have to win the race, but we don’t want to
start off in fourth place and end up tenth.
-------------------------------
I suspect
many Americans still think of their country as a place of refuge from religious
persecution, and various forms of totalitarian rule. It follows that for them
religion and less government must be good.
[Christian]
Fundamentalism isn’t just about the literal interpretation of scripture. It
can’t be, given there are so many conflicting literal interpretations. What
religious rigidity and stagnation do offer is another source of certainty which
reinforces resistance to change.
While the
rest of the west was experimenting with socialism, McCarthyism was exerting a
very strong conservative influence on generations of Americans. This was the
‘duck and cover’ era when Communism and death became inextricably linked in a
lot of impressionable young minds.
The
obvious failure of the USSR
has also reinforced the perception that socialism of any degree is evil. It’s
irrelevant that the USSR
was as socialist as my right boot, or that it was really a totalitarian state
built on a transparent lie. The lie has become truth through repetition – there
is no need to read Marx or question anything. [Best never forget, though, that
Jews started all that and cannot be trusted.]
Nothing
unites a community like a mutual threat. WWII, Vietnam, wars in [mainly
oil-rich] states and then 911 were galvanising – people could be unemployed
whites but still belong to something successful and strong that doesn’t let
anyone push them around e.g. America. War, sadly enough, provides a feel good
buzz.
The
military is big business and big business means jobs. As it’s a big budget
item, reduced military spending can shake the economy very badly.
American
politics, as one chap whose name I forget put it, is all about the ‘3 Gs” –
guns, god and gays. This sums up the right's way of thinking fairly well, I
reckon.
It’s the
foundation and source of a lot of Republican policies, the specifics of which
are a whole ‘nother topic.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)