2 point 6
billion.
Well,
that’s what the ubiquitous ‘they’ say the US election cost the parties, what
with ads and wotnot.
Some local
pundit has suggested that the next Australian election will be fought on
personality lines, presidential style. This is not a totally new idea – there is
always a percentage of voters who make their decision based on party leaders’
personalities [despite Costello’s assertion that we are all about policy and
party philosophy].
From what
I have seen at polling booths, personality-voting crosses all boundaries of
language, culture, and educational background. It would be unfair to expect all
recent immigrants be intimately acquainted with how our political system works,
party philosophies etc, when many 3rd or 4th generation
Aussies have no idea.
To my
credit, I do know the name of the state member for Frankston. This may or may
not be due to his scandalous abuse of his parliamentary vehicle to make
deliveries for his private business.
Today we
received flyers with pretty pictures on them and the headline “Delivering more
Police to Frankston”. Presumably the irony would be lost on him. But I digress.
In any case,
as it is a cardinal sin for MPs or Senators to cross the floor on any issue,
personality voting doesn’t seem all too silly.
Opinion
polls tell us at regular intervals who is the preferred prime minister – A or
B. We are now even getting A, B, C or D poll results: Julia/Kevin,
Tony/Malcolm.
I find it
inordinately frustrating that the pre-selection process is so closed in Australia . Yes,
I could sign up to a political party, but this is evidence of where Costello is
wrong: How can one support a party based on its philosophy and/or policies when
they so rarely seem to stand for anything at all? When, truth be told, they so
often stand only to make negative comments about other pollies’ personalities,
and then sit down again.
A good
buddy is a Labor die-hard. She goes along to meetings, conferences and all
that, then reports to me how meetings are stacked, pre-selections rigged and
more. I have flashbacks to stacked and manipulated meetings during the days of
compulsory union membership, and beg her to stop.
My dream –
pipe dream that it is – is that we could have a Presidential system. It is
irrelevant to me whether we retain allegiance to the monarchy or not.
Martin
Luther King Jr had a dream, but it was one that tapped into a rising tide of
public opinion. He was not a leader in the sense that he created the dream from
scratch, but a leader in that he was able to help people identify ways to achieve
that shared dream.
An
argument often used to counter the Presidential idea is that the US Presidential
race is so expensive it effectively disenfranchises poorer would-be Presidents.
Has no one noticed that we have had a succession of extremely wealthy Prime
Ministers, for decades?
A real
leader, theoretically, is able to elicit financial help from people who support
his/her vision, and feel that the leader can be trusted to deliver on it.
The Sunday
Age reports “it is estimated the Liberal Party will spend up to $35 million in
the push to install Mr Abbott into The Lodge”.
“The ACTU
put in place a compulsory $2 a member levy on its 1.8 million union members in
September.”
Labor
staffers have been asked to contribute “as little as $10 a fortnight” to a fighting
fund.
In an
extraordinary quote at the bottom of this article, new Greens leader Christine
Milne has openly called for donations for an “anti-Labor fighting fund”.
There
must be something I’ve missed. Tony wants to repeal the carbon tax, and thinks
[heaven knows how] that Labor is soft on asylum seekers. The Greens’ support is
the very thing that keeps Julia in The Lodge.
Oh, wait
a minute. None of this is about policies. I keep forgetting myself.
Will we
be going to the polls in March next year, before the budget blowout is
announced? Will we miss out on Joe Hockey’s performance of the “I told you so”
tango?
Thank
goodness St Patrick’s day is on a Sunday – for there will surely be many
sorrows to drown.
*this has
been unpaid waffle posted on a free blogging network
You SHOULD be in politics FC, I'd vote for you for sure!! Seriously, it really is getting harder and harder all the time to take politicians seriously, to believe that they really do have the average person's interests at heart. It really shocked me just how much was spent on the US elections, but as you say it's not peanuts here either! Off with their heads haha!!
ReplyDeleteGrace, you're very kind to tolerate my constant whining about politics. I would be very happy to participate in a benevolent dictatorship!
DeleteOff with their heads indeed! Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland is the most sensible political primer I've ever read!